Reverse Voltage Crosstalk ( A discussion of Exact and Approximate Equations)

Alan Staniforth Oct 2002

Crosstalk Equations

The single line characteristic impedance of a balanced pair of coupled transmission lines is Z_o. When the odd mode impedance is Z_oo and the even mode impedance is Z_oe, the reverse voltage crosstalk coefficient for both strong and weak coupling, is

Another equation for weak coupling can be obtained as follows.

Using (1.1) we get

The accuracy of the two approximations, (1.4) and (1.6), is examined for two configurations, a stripline and a surface microstrip. In both cases the independent lines have a characteristic impedance of 50 W. In both cases the substrate is FR4 with a dielectric constant of 4.2.

a)     Stripline.  Height of substrate is 500 mm, track thickness is 35 mm and the rectangular track width is 176.567 mm. The tracks are midway between the ground planes. 

 Figure 1 shows the values of Z_oo, Z_oe, Z_o^" = Å(Z_oeZ_oo), and (Z_oe + Z_oo)/2 as the separation of the tracks is varied.

Fig 1.

 From Fig. 1, it can be seen that for wide separations (ie. weak coupling), that Z_o = Z_o^" = Å( Z_oeZ_oo), eqn. (1.4) and Z_o = (Z_oe + Z_oo)/2, eqn. (1.6). However for small separations, where the coupling is stronger, Z_o^" < Z_o and (Z_oe + Z_oo)/2 < Z_o. The difference is noticeable when the separation < 250 mm or a separation/width ratio < 1.4.

Figure 2 shows the variation of the reverse voltage crosstalk, calculated using different equations, as the separation of the tracks is varied. In Fig. 2, the curve XE is calculated using the exact equation, (1.4), the curve XOE is calculated using the approximate equation, (1.7), and the curve XDF is calculated using the approximate equation (1.2). From the figure it can be seen that the crosstalk calculated from the equation containing the differential impedance, (1.2), is always greater than the exact value and becomes significantly in error for small separations. The crosstalk, calculated using the approximate equation containing Z_oe and Z_oo only, is always slightly less than the exact value: there is good agreement with the exact value even at small separations. The reason for this agreement is readily explained by reference to (1.5). There are no approximations in the numerator. However, Z_o in the large bracket of the denominator is an approximation using (1.4). Thus this “value” of “Z_o” will decrease with respect to the original value of Z_o as the separation decreases. This value is divided by the sum, Z_oe + Z_oo, which also decreases with respect to the original value of Z_o. Thus the ratio of these two terms remains approximately constant and hence the value of the crosstalk, calculated using (1.7), is almost the same, for all separations, as that calculated using the exact value (1.1)

Fig. 2.

b)Surface Microstrip. Height of substrate is 500 mm, track thickness is 35 mm and the rectangular track width is 953.136 mm.

 Figure 3 shows the values of the impedances etc, similar to those shown in Fig.1

Fig. 3

Figure 4, Shows the reverse voltage crosstalk similar to that shown in Fig.2.

The same comments used in figs. 1 and 2 apply to Figs. 3 and 4. except that the difference between Z₀" and Z₀ occurs for separations less than 750 mm or a separation/width ratio of 0.79. This ratio is less than that for the stripline used here.

Fig. 4

 Figure 5 shows the comparison between the reverse voltage crosstalk for the surface microstrip (XE(M) curve) and stripline (XE(S) curve), for a common separation/track width ratio. This figure shows that for large ratios where the coupling is very weak, the crosstalk is less for the stripline: for smaller ratios where the crosstalk is larger for the stripline. The crosstalk is equal for a ratio of 3.2.

Fig. 5

Conclusions

The calculations show that the reverse voltage crosstalk coefficient calculated using only the even mode impedance, Z_oe, and the odd mode impedance, Z_oo, through (1.7), is slightly less than, but also a very good approximation to, the exact value, (1.1) for most practical separations where crosstalk needs to be estimated rather than the impedance of coupled lines. The calculation using the differential impedance and characteristic impedance, (1.2) gives too large an estimate of the crosstalk for small separations.

Where both the even and odd mode impedances are available, e.g. as in the Si6000, then (1.7) is recommended.

Note: Eqn (1.1) uses Zo of the two identical (but uncoupled) feed lines to transmit to the coupled lines. This value of Zo (call it Zfeed) can be quite different from the uncoupled impedance, Zuncoup, of the coupled lines. For instance (1.1) was derived to examine the effect when a 50 Ohm differential CITS probe (for example) is used to measure a differential impedance of 75 Ohms. In this latter case Zuncoup will be different from 50 Ohms.

Eqn 1.7 was derived from 1.1 assuming that Zfeed = Zuncoup and the approximations given. In most cases of crosstalk (rather than "full" coupling) the assumption is that this is undesired and the "feed" line is now an uncoupled line. Under these circumstances both 1.1 and 1.7 give almost identical results.  when Zuncoup is not known then you can use 1.7. If Zuncoup (= Zo) is known then 1.1 can be used which assures accuracy in all circumstances:  

Sample Si6000 workbooks

Two sample si6000c workbooks are included with this application note to demonstrate deriving crosstalk (using equation 1.1).
The workbooks require the Si6000c to be installed and activated on the target PC.
Open the Si6000Expert.xls workbook prior to opening these worksheets.
If necessary, move the sample worksheets to the folder containing Si6000Expert.xls.

Click on the links below to download the sample Si6000c workbooks

Edge-coupled Surface Microstrip structure
Reverse Voltage Crosstalk - sample spreadsheet  SP100.zip

Edge-coupled Offset Stripline
Reverse Voltage Crosstalk - sample spreadsheet  SP101.zip

Polar Instruments Ltd

www.polarinstruments.com
mail@polarinstruments.com

Tel: +44 1481 253081 Fax: +44 1481 252476 © Polar Instruments 2002